Ad Widget

Collapse

Bloomberg's Soda Bill Passes

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MissJecka
    started a topic Bloomberg's Soda Bill Passes

    Bloomberg's Soda Bill Passes

    New York health board approves ban on large sodas - CNN.com

    A step in the right direction, yes?

  • Rojo
    replied
    Originally posted by j3nn View Post
    Then of course you have lobbyists that spend (collectively) $2+ billion per year influencing congress (which works out to $3.7+ MILLION per congressperson), campaign contributions, government contractors, bailouts (corporate welfare), subsidies to agri-business and all of the other businesses that are in bed with the government, the Federal Reserve (a privately owned corporation) that controls our money supply and injects the silent tax of inflation upon all of society, and a biased mainstream media that is controlled by 3 major players and I would say you are fooling yourself if you don't realize wealthy corporations that are using the government and its filthy rich politicians as a proxy to "legally" do their dirty deeds are already in control.
    Isn't this what OWS is saying? If you want to change the above then you ought to push for publicly-financed elections.

    Did you see the Bradly Manning posters? Do you follow Julian Assange saga? I'm on a lot of bulletin boards and these things get a collective yawn from so-call libertarians. It's the left that has taken up these causes.

    The government/private thing is a cunard. It's the argument that the ruling class would like us to have. The real divide is rule by people vs. rule by elites, whether these elite have a government office or chair on a corporate board doesn't ultimately mean much.

    Some would take that to mean that "rule by people" is people making choices in the market. I see that point but "the market" is only one sphere of human existence. And, I'd argue, it's not so "free". We should all realize that every time we enter a supermarket.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2tall
    replied
    Ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • merryish
    replied
    Agreed that it's worriesome. Especially when we're seeing occasional reports of farm-to-table celebrations shut down for "health violations." Given what the government seems to think is "healthy," I'd rather not see them legislating it.

    ...whoa, just read through the whole thread, and my on-topic reply now seems very off-topic! =/

    Leave a comment:


  • j3nn
    replied
    Originally posted by Rojo View Post
    We can plan societies through government or we can leave it to the rich.
    That's just your prejudicial ignorance talking. Let me give you some perspective:



    Then of course you have lobbyists that spend (collectively) $2+ billion per year influencing congress (which works out to $3.7+ MILLION per congressperson), campaign contributions, government contractors, bailouts (corporate welfare), subsidies to agri-business and all of the other businesses that are in bed with the government, the Federal Reserve (a privately owned corporation) that controls our money supply and injects the silent tax of inflation upon all of society, and a biased mainstream media that is controlled by 3 major players and I would say you are fooling yourself if you don't realize wealthy corporations that are using the government and its filthy rich politicians as a proxy to "legally" do their dirty deeds are already in control.

    Not everyone that is wealthy deserves to be lambasted simply for being wealthy. Only crooked companies and fascist politicians that allow these injustices against humanity deserve to be implicated for their individual offenses.

    Explain how government is protecting us from the same evil corporations that it is de facto aiding and abetting. I don't know how anyone could ignore the government's role in all that is wrong in our society and single out the wealthy, as if the wealthy in the private sector are the ones kidnapping (arresting) and throwing people into cages (prisons). No. The government does that on behalf of its cronies and itself when it arbitrarily enforces victimless crime laws and suppresses freedom of speech.
    Last edited by j3nn; 09-19-2012, 03:30 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • j3nn
    replied
    Originally posted by Rojo View Post
    To recap: future, hypothetical abuses that may result from a soda pop size limit are germane but real life abuses are "off-topic". Unbelievable.
    No one said NDAA isn't extremely terrible, it's frightening and everyone should be infuriated by it. If you'd like to discuss it, I'd love to. Start the convo... GO!

    Not that you actually care, because I believe you're just trolling, even if you are an anarcho-OWS-commie who thinks all rich people deserve to be burned at the stake and the government is a threat to individual freedom only in extreme cases that you happen to take issue with, I have been talking about it [NDAA] since I first heard about it. Maybe not on a nutrition forum, but places where it's not under the sub-forum of FOOD and nutrition. Regardless, this is a privately owned forum and the owner obviously frowns upon discussions that they consider off-topic. That's not my choice. Take it up with the forum owner.
    Last edited by j3nn; 09-19-2012, 03:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BONZ
    replied
    Originally posted by Rojo View Post
    We can plan societies through government or we can leave it to the rich.
    Last time I checked rich people haven't indefinitely detained anybody..... So are you really worried about the NDAA et al., or is all that cool as long as the mob gets together to stick it to the (rich) man every once in a while....? Speaking of, how is having Bloomberg (who can hardly be called "not rich") planning your little society working out for you? Do you feel like you're a part of that royal "we" doing the planning? Difference between "Bloomberg the Mayor" and "Bloomberg the Robber Barron" running things? Not much, I would think.
    Last edited by BONZ; 09-19-2012, 12:36 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rojo
    replied
    Originally posted by j3nn View Post
    Your argument is akin to one prison is more accommodating than another and completely ignores the point that planned societies have a historical track record of failure, but more importantly they take all dignity and confidence away from people.
    We can plan societies through government or we can leave it to the rich.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rojo
    replied
    Originally posted by j3nn View Post
    qft.
    You quoted for truth an incredibly ridiculous argument. (See above). Nice job.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rojo
    replied
    Originally posted by JWBooth View Post
    The power to regulate is the power to prohibit. Today the limit might be 12 oz, but nothing prevents them from lowering that down to 12 fluid millimeters. And what does stop and frisk, drones, or the Patriot Act have to do with the discussion at hand?
    To recap: future, hypothetical abuses that may result from a soda pop size limit are germane but real life abuses are "off-topic". Unbelievable.
    Last edited by Rojo; 09-19-2012, 12:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Thompson
    replied
    Just wait til the government takes over health care. They know they can't afford to take care of everyone if we are sick all the time, so it will be making more of these rules to keep us "healthy"!! Bigger Government=less freedom!

    Leave a comment:


  • j3nn
    replied
    Originally posted by AMonkey View Post
    Despite Europe having its share of problems, our style of government has allowed for some of the lowest rates of obesity, poverty, reoffending and crime, and the highest rates of literacy, intelligence, height and happiness in the developed world. I don't like big government, but it worked. Meanwhile 'murica is a country defined by the stark contrast between super rich and super poor and a healthcare system that costs billions, yet is totally inferior to systems like Frances. You have the highest prison population in terms of absolute and relative terms. So what exactly are you bashing again?
    Your argument is akin to one prison is more accommodating than another and completely ignores the point that planned societies have a historical track record of failure, but more importantly they take all dignity and confidence away from people. When people do not have to think for themselves or take responsibility for their lives, they become weak, feeble, and unmotivated. Confidence comes from people achieving success on their own. It comes from having the choice to help others and not being forced to do so at gunpoint. So other countries are more successful, but compared to WHAT? Compared to each other? Every country has its own form of enslavement, just because some allow a fraction more freedom or a bit more "security" than another is not commendable. It's still condoning theft, violence, and enslavement.

    Humans are not animals that need or want caretakers. If chickens knew why a farmer was feeding them, they wouldn't eat their food.

    Leave a comment:


  • DamienMaddox
    replied
    Originally posted by Rojo View Post
    I guess you guys probably don't believe in vaccinations either. "Freedom of choice" -- until your kid makes mine sick.
    How would your kid get sick if he/she was vaccinated?

    Leave a comment:


  • j3nn
    replied
    By the way, Bloomberg is also the same benevolent dictator that has banned feeding the homeless in some places due to unhealthy food donated. Now, I know a lot of shelf-stable foods are often atrocious nutrition-wise, but I think eating anything vs. starving to death is a no-brainer. Bloomberg is a Nazi. The ultimate control freak. He is scary as hell.

    Let me reiterate: This is not about soda. This is about 100 little sodas becoming one soda ordeal, like the Patriot Act. Liberty is not lost all at once; it's slowly chipped away, piece by piece. And when they have accumulated enough confidence in their ability to control people, they take giant leaps towards totalitarianism with huge losses to freedom such as NDAA and the TSA pat downs. Every freedom lost is a big deal. Don't ignore sniffles; they could be the early symptoms of developing pneumonia. Sort of like don't ignore those 10-15 vanity pounds that you gain over the holidays, if left unattended they could add up to 200 excess lbs of fat, little by little.
    Last edited by j3nn; 09-18-2012, 05:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • j3nn
    replied
    Originally posted by jwbooth View Post
    the power to regulate is the power to prohibit. Today the limit might be 12 oz, but nothing prevents them from lowering that down to 12 fluid millimeters. And what does stop and frisk, drones, or the patriot act have to do with the discussion at hand? I'm pretty sure most of us opposed to herr bloomberg's soda cup ban are also strong opponents of the abuses of the nycpd and washington too. The point is, we have to fight government abuse at all levels and in all forms whether it be taxes, soda regulations, indefinite detention, pornography bans, drug laws, or whatever. The more issues the government has to defend against, the weaker it becomes.
    qft.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X